BaKhabar, Vol 5, Issue 10, October 2012
Page-1|Page-2 | Page-3 |Page-4|Page-5|Page-6 |Page-8 |Page-9 | Page-10 | BaKhabar  Download pdf of this Issue Download pdf
A VERY DISTURBING INCIDENT

... by Dr. M.A. Haque*

I read the news in the National daily, the Hindustan Times, New Delhi, August 09, 2012 (“After Baby Boy, Desperate Mom Tries to Sell Daughter”). The news item was not adequately highlighted as it has become the way of life in our country. But I had to lower my head in shame. I recollected the earlier incident involving the same woman when she had sold her eight months old son for only Rs. 62/50. This time she tried to sell her eight year old daughter for another paltry sum. Name of the woman is Shannu Khatun and she is from Araria (Bihar). The news item this time as well as earlier clearly mentioned that the woman was unable to support herself and her children. So, she was forced to sell the children to save them from starvation. Thankfully, the girl was rescued. Otherwise there was strong possibility that she could have landed up in some brothel or she was kept as a slave to do household chorus in some rich household. After all, the person, Ramchandra Rishideo of Nepal who bought her was not going to adopt her as his daughter or so.

Poor woman in Bihar sells child for Rs 62

I felt ashamed because the woman was a Muslim and belonged to Araria in Bihar. I am not very well aware of the population structure of the Araria town. I had heard about the town from my deceased uncle who was posted there about ten years back as Dist. Auditor. Also, taking into account the general pattern of population in the region I am sure there must be sufficient number of Muslims in the town and surrounding areas and a substantial number of the Muslims should be of the financial status for whom Zakaat should be obligatory. With this background, if a Muslim woman had to sell her children for paltry sums, it reflects on the entire Muslim community of the area.

I can conclude either of the two:

The first conclusion is that Muslims who are supposed to pay Zakaat are not fulfilling their obligations honestly. I have come across cases where people, who are millionaires, paid 500, 1000 or so to one or more Madarsaas once a while and considered that their obligations were fulfilled. That too they do because some 'Safirs' from the Madarsaas arrive at their doorstep. The other conclusion is that people do pay adequate Zakaat. But they do it the easiest way. They pay the amount to street beggars or beggars sitting outside Dargaahs, mosques etc. irrespective of the fact that they are professional beggars. Most of them do begging as profession. Another way in which people pay Zakaat is to give the amount to the Safirs of Madarsaas. No one will be against that. After all, the Madarssas do need support for their survival. But many a times the amount is given to Madarsaas about which we have no idea whether they exist and if so what is their strength and activities. I have personally encountered Safirs from Bihar, West Bengal etc. in Gurgaon. They carry a Receipt Book, one or two Letters of Authorization signed by ‘someone’ and some Photographs. On the basis of the same people pay the Zakaat to them. Interesting is the fact that they come from places like Kishanganj, Barsoi, Purnea, Bhagalpur, Murshidabad, Patna etc., all of which have large percentage of Muslim population and substantial numbers of them are well off, on whom Zakaat will be obligatory. But the Safirs travel more than 1000 km to collect contributions from Delhi, Gurgaon, Faridabad etc. for the Madarsaas. These places do not have high percentage of Muslim households. More importantly there are local Madarsaas etc. which deserve the support first. Still, the Safirs arrive in hordes, especially during Ramazaan.  How much money they spend on travelling and logistics etc. can be easily estimated. The question is why they do not work in their own area? One apprehension that comes to my mind is that those Madarsaas may be only in the ‘bags’ carried by the Safirs. Another possibility is that the institutions are too small and ill-equipped to attract attention of local people. People outside pay in good faith. Chances are that the money is wasted. I am confident that everyone is aware of the fact that these Safirs collect contributions on Commission basis and these days the percentage of Commission has risen to 60% or so. That is the reason that large numbers of these Safirs are whole-timers. Round the year they do only collection and nothing else. Also, incidents have been reported in media about Non-Muslims carrying Receipt etc. in the name of non-existent Madarsaas to collect funds. Still people give their Zakaat money to those Safirs. There are two reasons for the same. One, that they are ignorant of the instructions of Qur’an, and another because that is the easiest path. The ‘Safirs’ arrive at their doorstep or can be easily located in the mosques, especially after the Friday Prayers. They just handover the money to them and feel relieved.

But, in both the instances the obligation of Zakaat cannot be considered fulfilled. It has been made adequately clear that we have to pay Zakaat which is obligatory, if we have adequate surplus assets/wealth. In today's situation the valuation will work out to a little more than Rs One Lakh. Hundreds of Muslim families will be there in most cities and towns on which Zakaat will be obligatory. The second direction is: "Wazil Qurbaa, Wal Yataamaa, Wal Masaakeen...........". We are supposed to find those who are close to us and are needy. They may be in our own family, among relatives or in the neighbourhood. They should be provided first. Next priority is for the Orphans, who need financial assistance. Finally, the general poor find place in the list. I agree that the Madarsaas are generally populated by children from poor families, who are unable to send them to formal schools. But that does not give them priority over the first two categories as mentioned in Qur'an.                                        
top

Obviously people of the Araria town have not been obeying the instructions given in Qur’an. Otherwise the woman had not to sell her two children. The people of Araria could have easily provided money meant for Zakaat, Fitraa, Sadqaa etc. and she could support the family without any problem. That is the purpose of Zakaat, Fitraa and Sadqaa etc.

Here we need to analyse one more aspect. Most of the Muslims recite Qur’an regularly and in Ramazaan the intensity and frequency is much more. There are people who finish entire Qur’an at least once during the Ramazaan. Many finish the recitation of Qur’an twice, thrice or even more times. The intention is to collect Thawaab, which they must be receiving. But the purpose of Qur’an is not only to receive Thawaab. Qur’an is a complete guide to for us to lead our life on day to day basis. The problem is that we recite the Qur’an in Arabic. But most of us do not understand the lessons/instructions given there. Reason is that we do not understand the meaning/sense, as we do not learn Arabic as a language. To facilitate the same various scholars have translated Qur’an in the languages we understand. There is no such language on the Earth in which translation of Qur’an is not available. Also, Tafaseer (explanations) are available in all languages. There those minute points are explained which do not become clear in translations.

We need to understand Qur’an while reciting it. For that we need to read the translation and Tafseer. Only then we can lead our life as ordained by Allah and suggested by Prophet SAW. Only then the actual purpose of Zakaat, Fitraa, Sadqaa etc. and other obligations will be clear to us and we will be able to fulfill our duties in the desired manner.   

___________________________________
* Dr. M.A. Haque retired as a top officer in government of India. He lives in Palam Vihar, Gurgaon-122017. He can be contacted at asrarulhaque@hotmail.com
Bal Thackeray: Identity Politics to the Fore

--- By Ram Puniyani
*
The declaration of demise of Bal Thackeray (November 17, 2012) has brought the Mumbai city to a complete halt. Most of the news channels are relaying his death procession round the clock and having discussion about his tall stature most of the time. His grip on the city had been more or less complete from last three decades in particular. The methods he employed had some supporters on one side but for others it filled the people with fear, as his followers had been openly indulging in acts of vandalism time and over again. Today it is very difficult to say that city has come to a halt merely out of reverence for him alone or fear factor is also there behind this closure of the city will have to be assessed over a period of time.
 
As per some accounts Thackeray family had migrated from Bihar and finally settled in Maharashtra. Bal Thackeray came to prominence for voicing the need for jobs for ‘sons of the soil’ and with open threats to South Indians, Gujarathis, Biharis in that order. His initial role was that of breaking the left controlled trade unions, at the behest of the industrialists and section of the ruling party, Congress. This action of his had led to lot of violence between the leftist trade unions and Thackeray followers. The peak of this was murder of the CPI trade Unionist Krishna Desai, a blow from which the left trade unions could not recover.                                                  
top 
He later jumped to bandwagon of Hidnutva politics, openly supporting the Bari demolition and playing an active part in the horrific Mumbai violence of 92-93. His writings in Saamna, the Shiv Sena mouth piece, were very provocative and could easily come under the clause of ‘Hate Speech’ but despite that the case filed by some Mumbai citizens fell through and Thackeray continued to spread his anti Muslim tirade through his speeches and writings. True later Election Commission disenfranchised him for six years from voting. After Babri demolition, someone suggested that the Shiv Sainiks were the one who demolished it; he cleverly lapped it up and said that if Shiv Sainiks have done it I am proud of that.
 
The violence which followed the demolition was probed by Shrikishna Commission. This commission’s findings indicted the Shiv Sena supremo. The celebration rallies were organized by Shiv Sena in Dharavi jurisdiction amongst others. The commission pointed out 
“These Celebrations by Shiv Sena had mobs which were chanting provocative slogans: Musalman Ka Do Hi Sthan: Pakistan Ya Kabristhan (Muslims can only be in: Pakistan or Graveyard). In retaliation Muslims shout: Jo ham se takarayega: Mitti me mil Jayega (Those who attack us will be decimated).
To cite another example of Thackeray’s complicity and role in violence one recalls from Shrikrishna Commission report that ”On 1st January 1993 there was an article in Samna under the caption’ Hindunni Akramak Vhayala Have’,(Hindus should become aggressive now) openly inciting Hindus to violence.” (Volume 1 page 13)                                  
top Shiv Sena activists attack the office of Maharstra Times
 The more striking observation of the Commission was " From the conversation which could be heard [by Yuvraj Mohite, Mahanagar Reporter, at Thackeray house during the riots], it is clear that Thackeray was directing Shiv Sainiks, Shakha Pramukhs and other activists of Shiv Sena to attack the Muslims, to ensure that they give tit for tat and ensure that 'not a single landya (a derogatory term for Muslims) would survive to give the evidence’ [vol.ii, Page 173-174]...the communal passions of the Hindus were aroused to a feverish pitch by the inciting writings, particularly in Saamna and Navakal.” [Volume 1, page 21-22]. “...and violence in January (1993) was taken over by Shiv Sena and its leaders who continued to whip up communal frenzy by their statements and acts and writings and directives issued by Shiv Sena Pramukh Thackeray.”
 
This is just a small sample of what was the role of Thackeray and his Shiv Sena in The Mumbai violence. After the Mumbai violence he started being called Hindu Hriday Samrat and had a total grip on the politics of Shiv Sena. He was unfazed by the impact of his beliefs and actions. In his famous interview to the time magazine (titled: Kick them out!) during this time he poured vitriol on the Muslims with all abuses and hate. As Muslims were fleeing Mumbai he said that Muslims need to be taught a lesson. If they are fleeing Mumbai, it’s OK; else they should be kicked out.
 
He has been an opponent of Indo-Pak friendship all through. Be it the question of Indo Pak Cricket match or the concert of Pakistani Gazal singers, Mumbai witnessed the ‘direct action’ of Shiv Sainkis in the form of digging the cricket ground pitch at Kotla cricket ground or vandalizing the Gazal concert in Mumbai. Much before the coming to fore of the terror of groups related to Sadhvi Prgya Singh Thakur or Swami Aseemanand, it was Thackeray who had called for the formation of ‘suicide squads’ by Hindus. A self avowed admirer of Hitler, he conceded that he appreciates Hitler and that he himself has many traits similar to Hitler. He believed in Thokshahi (Dictatorship) not Lokshahi (democracy).
 
The divisive politics of Hidutva or the identity politics built around ‘sons of the soil’ does run parallel to his opposition to the affirmative action and aspirations of deprived sections of society. True to that he opposed the implementation of Mandal Commission, indicating his anti OBC politics. He was the only one who stated it openly. The other party thoroughly opposed to Mandal, BJP, which is opposed to affirmative action for any weaker section of society, dodged the issue and intensified on Ram Temple issue to bypass this affirmative action for OBCs. Similarly Thackeray has been vehement opponent of dalit aspirations in any form. When the Maharashtra Government published Babasaheb Ambedkar’s book, ‘Riddles of Rama and Krishna’, Shiv Sena stood to oppose it in a serious way and there was some violence between Shiv Sena supporters and dalits. When the issue of changing the name of Marathwada University to Ambedkar’s name came, Thackeray opposed it strongly leading to another bout of unrest. It is just a tragedy of our times that despite this clear agenda of Thackeray, some dalit parties are allying with his party at electoral level.
 
The massive turnout as his funeral is being read as that he was the voice of Marathi manoos. True a section of Marathi people adore him, but the larger section of poor peasants, the workers and dalits from Maharashtra know that Thackeray has been no representative of their aspirations. With so many problems nagging the poor of Maharashtra there is a need to shift the terrain of politics away from identity politics of the likes of Thackeray to the material issues related to bread, butter, shelter and employment. The politics of Hindu nation and Marathi manoos is against the values of Indian Constitution which call for the principles of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. How did Thackeray’s politics conform to these is a matter of introspection.
 
___________________________________       top
* Ram Puniyani (born 25 Aug 1945) was a professor in biomedical engineering at the IIT Bombay. He is involved with human rights activities, for communal harmony, has taken initiatives to oppose the rising tide of Fundamentalism in India. He is a pillar of secular and democratic initiatives like All India Secular Forum, Center for Study of Society and Secularism and ANHAD. His write-ups appear in reputed Indian newspapers, regularly. Email: ram.puniyani@gmail.com
7
Home | About Us | Objective | Scholarship | Matrimonial | Video Library | Projects | Quran Resources | Lend a hand
Copyright © 2008 Bihar Anjuman